Climate threat to 85% of Amazon forest

 Global warming will wreck attempts to save the Amazon rainforest, according to a devastating new study which predicts that one-third of its trees will be killed by even modest temperature rises. The research, by British climate change specialists, shows even severe cuts in deforestation and carbon emissions will fail to save the rainforest, the destruction of which has become a powerful symbol of human impact on the planet. Up to 85 per cent of the forest could be lost if greenhouse gas emissions are not brought under control, the experts said. Even under the most optimistic climate change scenarios, the destruction of large parts of the forest is "irreversible." Vicky Pope, of the U.K. Meteorological Office's Hadley Centre, which carried out the study, said: "The impacts of climate change on the Amazon are much worse than we thought. As temperatures rise quickly over the coming century the damage to the forest won't be obvious straight away, but we could be storing up trouble for the future." Tim Lenton, a climate expert at the University of East Anglia, England, called the study, presented at a global warming conference in Copenhagen on Wednesday, a "bombshell." The study, which has been submitted to the journal Nature Geoscience, used computer models to investigate how the Amazon would respond to future temperature rises. It found that a 2{+0}C rise above pre-industrial levels, widely considered the best-case global warming scenario and the target for ambitious international plans to curb emissions, would still see 20 per cent -40 per cent of the Amazon die off within 100 years. A 3{+0}C rise would see 75 per cent of the forest destroyed by drought over the following century, while a 4{+0}C rise would kill 85 per cent. Experts had previously predicted that global warming could cause significant "die-back" of the Amazon. The new research is the first to quantify the long-term effect. Chris Jones, who led the research, told the conference: "A temperature rise of anything over 1{+0}C commits you to some future loss of Amazon forest. Even the commonly quoted 2{+0}C target already commits us to 20 per cent – 40 per cent loss. On any kind of pragmatic timescale, I think we should see loss of the Amazon forest as irreversible."Peter Cox, professor of climate system dynamics at the University of Exeter, England, said the effects would be felt around the world. "Destroying the Amazon would also turn what is a significant carbon sink into a significant source." Jones said the study showed that tree growth in high latitudes, such as Siberia, would increase, but would be unlikely to compensate for the carbon stocks lost from the Amazon. Even with drastic cuts in emissions in the next decade, scientists say there will be only about a 50 per cent chance of keeping global temperature rises below 2{+0}C. This best-case emissions scenario is based on emissions peaking in 2015 and quickly changing from an increase of 2 per cent – 3 per cent a year to a decrease of 3 per cent a year. For every 10 years this action is delayed, the most likely temperature rise increases by 0.5{+0}C. Environmental campaigners said they were alarmed by the predictions. "With a rise of over 2{+0}C you begin to see a large-scale change to Savannah," said Beatrix Richards, head of forest policy and trade at WWF UK. "You also lose major ecosystem services, such as keeping carbon levels stable, providing indigenous people with goods and services, and balancing rainfall patterns globally from the U.S. grain belt to as far away as Kazakhstan. "A 4{+0}C [rise] is a nightmare scenario that would move us into uncharted territory." The results were announced on the second day of the Copenhagen meeting, which is intended to spur politicians into taking action to cut carbon pollution. It comes before a United Nations summit in December, also in Copenhagen, where officials will try to agree a new global deal on climate to replace the Kyoto protocol. The results from the meeting will be published in the summer as a supplement to the 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

 

The Hindu, 13th March 2009